🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to block their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," commented a leading MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for children," stated a influential peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is largely occurring at the local level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced bills mandating parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of the West, other states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more measured position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in safety.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the policies of Australia and others show that governments globally are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.